1
Separation Type
2
Scope & Timeline

Intake Diagnostic · Step 1 of 2

What kind of separation
are you managing?

Select the scenario closest to your situation. We’ve architected solutions for every permutation — this helps us route you to the right practice lead.

Not sure? — our team will scope appropriately.

Intake Diagnostic · Step 2 of 2

Scope, jurisdiction,
and urgency.

Three questions. This is the intake call — just quieter and at your pace.

Expect a response within 4 business hours. All information is handled under NDA.

WARN Act ComplianceMulti-Jurisdiction RIFExecutive Separation AgreementsOWBPA-Compliant ReleasesOutplacement ArchitectureCommunication StrategyPost-Merger RedundancyClean Release ExecutionSeries C DissolutionCross-Border StructuringWARN Act ComplianceMulti-Jurisdiction RIFExecutive Separation AgreementsOWBPA-Compliant ReleasesOutplacement ArchitectureCommunication StrategyPost-Merger RedundancyClean Release ExecutionSeries C DissolutionCross-Border Structuring

Anonymized Engagements

Every scenario.
Already handled.

Select any engagement to see the full separation architecture — problem, structure, communication, and outcome.

Global RetailCritical

Global Retailer

1,400 Separations / 6 Countries / Zero Litigation

Post-merger redundancy program across EU, UK, and North America under a 90-day close mandate.

1,400

Separations

6

Countries

100%

Release Rate

84

Days

Modern corporate office interior with clean lines and organized workspace

The Situation

Following a $2.1B acquisition, our client faced immediate redundancy obligations across six jurisdictions with conflicting notice requirements, three active union agreements, and a board-mandated 90-day execution window.

Separation Architecture

We designed jurisdiction-specific separation packages with tiered WARN Act compliance, coordinated with local counsel in Germany, France, and the UK to satisfy Works Council consultation requirements, and built a centralized release management system that tracked every agreement through signature.

Communication Strategy

A three-tier communication cascade was deployed: board-to-executive briefing, manager-enablement kits in four languages, and individual employee letters timed to the minute across time zones.

Measurable Outcome

1,400 separations executed in 84 days. All 1,400 releases signed. Zero EEOC charges filed in the 24 months following. The client's employment brand maintained a 4.1 Glassdoor rating through the transition.

Zero Litigation
Series C StartupCritical

Series C Technology Company

Product Team Dissolution / 140 Engineers / 72-Hour Window

Overnight elimination of an entire product vertical following a strategic pivot, with WARN Act exposure and active visa holders.

140

Engineers

72

Hours to Execute

23

Visa Holders

0

Charges Filed

Technology office with developers at workstations in a modern open floor plan

The Situation

The company's board approved a full product pivot at 6pm on a Thursday. By Friday morning, 140 engineers needed to be separated, including 23 H-1B visa holders, 4 employees on FMLA, and a recently announced pregnant employee.

Separation Architecture

We deployed an emergency WARN Act analysis within 2 hours, identifying the 60-day pay-in-lieu obligation and structuring packages accordingly. Each protected-class employee received a custom legal review before any communication was issued.

Communication Strategy

Individual manager scripts were written and rehearsed in a 4-hour window. A dedicated separation hotline was stood up by 8am Friday. All 140 conversations happened within a 3-hour window on Monday morning.

Measurable Outcome

140 separations completed in 72 hours from board approval. All releases signed within 21 days. The 23 visa holders received immigration counsel referrals as part of their packages. No litigation filed.

Zero Charges
PE PortfolioCritical

PE-Backed Manufacturer

3,200 RIF / 12 Plants / 4 States / WARN Act Complexity

Post-LBO workforce restructuring across legacy manufacturing facilities with multi-union environments and pension obligations.

3,200

Separations

12

Plants

4

WARN Filings

0

Challenges

Industrial manufacturing facility with organized production floor and safety markings

The Situation

Following a leveraged buyout, the new ownership needed to right-size a 12-plant operation across four states. Three facilities had active CBA negotiations. Two plants triggered WARN Act obligations. Pension plan termination was concurrent.

Separation Architecture

Separation architecture was built plant-by-plant, with union-specific release language negotiated with each local. WARN Act notices were filed in all four states simultaneously. A pension transition team was embedded within our separation architects.

Communication Strategy

Plant-level town halls were scripted and facilitated by our team, with union stewards briefed 48 hours in advance under NDA. Individual letters were hand-delivered by trained separation coaches.

Measurable Outcome

3,200 separations across 14 months. All four WARN Act filings accepted without challenge. Pension obligations transferred cleanly. Two plants converted to third-party operations with 60% workforce retention offers.

Clean Execution
Public CompanyCritical

NYSE-Listed Healthcare Company

Executive Suite Restructure / 8 C-Suite Departures / Proxy Sensitivity

Simultaneous departure of the CFO, COO, and six direct reports amid an SEC investigation and activist shareholder campaign.

8

C-Suite Exits

0

SEC Comments

28

Days to Close

0

Proxy Challenges

Executive boardroom with long conference table and city skyline view through windows

The Situation

The company needed to separate eight C-suite executives simultaneously while managing SEC disclosure obligations, activist investor scrutiny, and a pending proxy vote — all within a 30-day window before quarterly earnings.

Separation Architecture

Each separation agreement was structured with disclosure-compliant language reviewed by outside securities counsel. Clawback provisions, non-disparagement carve-outs for SEC cooperation, and equity treatment were individually negotiated.

Communication Strategy

A press release strategy was co-developed with IR and outside counsel. Board talking points were prepared for the activist engagement. Individual executives received dedicated separation counsel at company expense.

Measurable Outcome

All eight separations completed before earnings. SEC disclosure reviewed without comment. Proxy vote proceeded with no separation-related challenges. Four executives publicly acknowledged the process as professionally handled.

Disclosure-Clean
Financial ServicesComplex

Regional Bank Holding Company

680 Separations / Branch Network Closure / CRA Obligations

Full branch network wind-down following regulatory consent order, with Community Reinvestment Act obligations and concurrent CFPB scrutiny.

680

Separations

34

Branches

0

Media Incidents

0

CFPB Actions

Modern bank building exterior with glass facade and professional signage

The Situation

Under a consent order, the bank needed to close 34 branches and separate 680 employees while maintaining CRA compliance and managing CFPB oversight of customer communication — all without triggering media coverage that could cause deposit flight.

Separation Architecture

A phased separation schedule was built around branch closure sequencing to maintain operational continuity. CRA compliance documentation was built into each separation record. A media containment protocol was developed with external communications counsel.

Communication Strategy

All customer-facing employees received separation-specific scripts to manage customer inquiries. Media silence was maintained through day 47. Internal communication was tiered by role and branch to prevent information leakage.

Measurable Outcome

680 separations over 6 months with zero media coverage during the critical window. CRA obligations satisfied. No deposit flight attributable to the separation process. CFPB review closed without action.

Regulatory Clean
Technology Scale-upComplex

Late-Stage Technology Company

22% Workforce Reduction / Global / IPO Timeline Maintained

Pre-IPO workforce right-sizing across 14 countries with S-1 disclosure implications and investor relations management.

890

Employees

14

Countries

41

Days

0

IPO Delay

Technology company open office with collaborative workspace and modern design elements

The Situation

The company needed to reduce headcount by 22% (890 employees) across 14 countries within a 45-day window to clean up the cap table and workforce cost structure before S-1 filing. Any litigation would delay the IPO by 6–12 months.

Separation Architecture

A country-by-country separation matrix was built with local employment counsel in all 14 jurisdictions. S-1 disclosure language was co-drafted with securities counsel to accurately characterize the restructuring without triggering investor concern.

Communication Strategy

An investor-ready narrative was developed before any employee communication. All-hands messaging was scripted to reinforce the company's growth trajectory while acknowledging the difficulty of the decision.

Measurable Outcome

890 separations in 41 days across 14 countries. S-1 filed on schedule. Zero litigation filed in the 12 months following. IPO completed at target valuation.

IPO On Schedule

The Record

Numbers that don’t require
a footnote.

Proof Point

0

Workforce transitions managed

Across 34 countries, 9 industries, and every regulatory environment we've encountered.

Proof Point

0%

Clean release execution rate

Signed separation agreements, no outstanding challenges, 24 months post-execution.

Proof Point

$0

Average litigation cost to clients

Because the architecture prevents the exposure before the first conversation happens.

Proof Point

0hrs

Average first response time

From intake submission to assigned practice lead with a proposed scope outline.

Proof Point

0

Jurisdictions navigated

Federal, state, local, and international — including 38 with mandatory consultation requirements.

Proof Point

0%

Engagements under NDA

Every intake, every engagement, every outcome. Discretion is the product.

“The separation is not the crisis. The unprepared separation is the crisis. Every number above is the difference between those two sentences.”

— Managing Partner, Sever Separation Partners

Open Positions

Join the Separation Practice.

For practitioners who have always treated separation work as a discipline — not a detour, not a cleanup, not a task assigned when no one else wants it.

View All Roles

Who we hire: Former HR directors who managed 500+ person RIFs. Employment attorneys who drafted the releases. Outplacement coaches who ran the programs. If you’ve been the person in the room — we want to talk.

6 open roles · All senior-level

Separation Practice

Separation Consultant

SeniorFull-TimeNew York, NY

You've sat in the room where the decision was made. Now you architect the exit.

Apply — Separation Consultant

Outplacement

Outplacement Coach

Mid-LevelFull-TimeChicago, IL · Remote

Career transition work that actually matters — at scale, with real resources behind it.

Apply — Outplacement Coach

Legal Architecture

Employment Law Advisor

PrincipalFull-TimeSan Francisco, CA

WARN Act, OWBPA, multi-jurisdiction RIF compliance — this is all you do, and you're exceptional at it.

Apply — Employment Law Advisor

Communication

HR Communications Strategist

SeniorFull-TimeRemote (US)

You write the words that managers say in the hardest conversation of someone's career.

Apply — HR Communications Strategist

Separation Practice

RIF Program Manager

DirectorFull-TimeNew York, NY · London, UK

Multi-country, multi-union, 90-day clock. You've done it before. Do it here with the right infrastructure.

Apply — RIF Program Manager

Executive Practice

Executive Separation Specialist

SeniorFull-TimeNew York, NY

C-suite exits, board dynamics, securities disclosure implications — the most sensitive work in the field.

Apply — Executive Separation Specialist

Start the Intake Call

The decision has been made.
Now it needs to be handled.

Every day between the decision and the architecture adds exposure. Our intake process takes 4 minutes. Your practice lead responds within 4 hours.

All intakes under NDANo engagement obligation4-hour responseGlobal coverage

Most Recent Engagement

Global Retailer · 1,400 Separations · 6 Countries

Completed 6 days under deadline. Zero litigation.

Current Active Engagements

14 programs across 9 jurisdictions

Including 3 simultaneous multi-country RIFs.

Next Available Intake Slot

Today · 4-hour response window

Immediate urgency engagements accepted 24/7.